FUCK YOU, Bob Kraft. Model franchise, my ass. Why don’t you go have a glass of water to clear out the frog that’s been in your throat for the past 60 fucking years.
FUCK YOU to Bill Belichick. You know what’s even nicer than that fact you lost, you fucking shit stain? The fact that you might also lose your fucking job. Isn’t that lovely? Not only did you lose a game, but you also stand to lose your livelihood, your reputation, and your legacy. I, for one, am extremely excited for you to grow a beard, move to Iceland, and become an anti-semite. Cockbag.
FUCK YOU to the Patriots fans out there. “This one hurts!” “This one stings!” Awww, you poor things! You had to suffer through ONE loss all year! Oh no! HERE COMES THE RAIN AGAIN! You may never recover!
FUCK YOU, as always, to Bill Simmons. Here, I rewrote your article today so that it was even closer to your own voice:“When the final seconds ticked down on Super Bowl XLII, I and I assume the rest of Boston had but one thought: REGGIE LEWIS.”Suck it. No Tom Brady soiree for you, dipshit. Just an awkward conversation with Ufford and big helping of shut the fuck up.
FUCK YOU to Patriot players who invited Giant players to their celebration parties AS THEY WERE GETTING THEIR ASSES HANDED OT THEM DURING THE GAME. Well done, jackasses. No egos in that locker room!
FUCK YOU to Jim Nantz. Your favorite team lost, you white asshole.
FUCK YOU to the Pats’ o-line and their playoff beards. Go play hockey or work in Chelsea love dungeon, you hairy-assed fat fucks.
FUCK YOU to Randy Moss. Disappearing in a big game against the Giants? Hey, thanks for the flashback to 2000, you dick. I hope the charges stick this time.
FUCK YOU to the Patriot Way. “Oh, we’re not like other franchises! We’re selfless! We’re all about the team! All we care about is winning! We invented teamwork! No other team has better chemistry! WE HAVE A CULTURE! WE’RE SPECIAL AND WAY BETTER THAN YOU!” Die.
FUCK YOU to all the Pats fans who talked about how getting caught in some malfeasance - cheating, beating up women, taking steroids - only made the team better. "We draw power from our ability to break rules!" Guzzle cock, fucktasters.
FUCK YOU to Matt Walsh. Guess what I taped last night? Me punching your children.
FUCK YOU to the Pats equipment manager. I dunno who you are, but I fucking hate you.
FUCK YOU to Koolaid Maroney. That’s what you get for denying the existence of construda.
FUCK YOU to Wes Welkah.
FUCK YOU to any children who root for the Patriots. I hope your peers shun you in middle school.
Monday, February 4, 2008
Friday, February 1, 2008
The Kodak Theater Debate
A few items of note from last night's Democratic Debate between frontrunners Hillary Clinton and Barack Obama (Old Man Gravel is still out there somewhere):
On Health Care:
Senator Clinton claims that, under her plan, she would "pay for this is to take the Bush tax cuts that are set to expire on people making more than $250,000 a year. That would raise about $55 billion...The other $55 billion would come from the modernization and the efficiencies that I believe we can obtain." Unfortunately for her, the math doesn't add up. Even raising taxes to previous levels on the 5.8 million Americans who make only $126K and up would raise about $30 billion at the most. Second, she has never said what these modernizations and efficiencies are. How come she would be able to find them, and the rest of us haven't?
Senator Obama claims that the main difference between his plan and Clinton's is that his plan is "voluntary," as opposed to Clinton's "mandatory" plan. When pressed on how his plan would be funded if millions of Americans refused to join, he would solve the problem "By, for example, making them pay some of the back premiums for not having gotten it in the first place." So his plan is "voluntary" yet would penalize people for not having it.
On Immigration:
Senator Obama: "I think to suggest somehow that the problem that we're seeing in inner-city unemployment, for example, is attributable to immigrants, I think, is a case of scapegoating that I do not believe in." Then, maybe three minutes later: "I also believe we have to give a pathway to citizenship after they have paid a fine and learned English, to those who are already here, because if we don't, they will continue to undermine U.S. wages." Double talk much, Senator?
Obama also favors punishing employers who hire illegal imiigrants, but not because that's against US law or anything, but "we do have to crack down on those employers that are taking advantage of the situation, hiring folks who cannot complain about worker conditions, who aren't getting the minimum wage sometimes, or aren't getting overtime." It's nice to know Obama cares more for the illegal immigrants than those losing jobs because of them.
Senator Clinton, on the other hand, is much more direct about her desire for blanket amnesty: "We will give you a path to legalization if you meet the following condition: pay a fine because you entered illegally, be willing to pay back taxes over time, try to learn English -- and we have to help you do that, because we've cut back on so many of those services." In other words, "We'll give you citizenship, and we'll do everything for you."
During an otherwise dull segment that had nothing to do with issues, Clinton was asks what people would think of another Clinton in the White House, to which she responded with this whopper: "We start from the same place. Nobody has an advantage no matter who you are or where you came from." Sure, Senator. That's why everyone I know is running for President.
On Iraq:
Senator Clinton justifying withdrawing American troop from Iraq: "Yes, we are withdrawing...it's important to send that message to the region, because I think that Iran, Syria, the other countries in the neighborhood, are going to find themselves in a very difficult position as we withdraw. You know, be careful what you wish for.They will be dragged into what is sectarian divisiveness with many different factions among the three main groups." So by running away, we're going to make it the rest of the region's problem? No, Senator. By running away we're going to tell Iran, Syria, and a host of other unsavory characters, "Do with Iraq as you will. It's not our problem anymore."
Senator Clinton also pointed out that she "had to fight to get body armor" for American troops. Maybe she can take that gripe to her buddies like John Kerry, who "voted for the $87 billion (to fund our troops) before voting against it." Even four years later, that still doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
The debate was actually quite civil when the candidates were going after each other. Their major differences came on the minutiae of their policies, which really don;t differ much. One more interesting note: One of the TV sponsors of the debate was an organization that espouses the benefits of using coal, which everyone knows liberals absolutely love.
On Health Care:
Senator Clinton claims that, under her plan, she would "pay for this is to take the Bush tax cuts that are set to expire on people making more than $250,000 a year. That would raise about $55 billion...The other $55 billion would come from the modernization and the efficiencies that I believe we can obtain." Unfortunately for her, the math doesn't add up. Even raising taxes to previous levels on the 5.8 million Americans who make only $126K and up would raise about $30 billion at the most. Second, she has never said what these modernizations and efficiencies are. How come she would be able to find them, and the rest of us haven't?
Senator Obama claims that the main difference between his plan and Clinton's is that his plan is "voluntary," as opposed to Clinton's "mandatory" plan. When pressed on how his plan would be funded if millions of Americans refused to join, he would solve the problem "By, for example, making them pay some of the back premiums for not having gotten it in the first place." So his plan is "voluntary" yet would penalize people for not having it.
On Immigration:
Senator Obama: "I think to suggest somehow that the problem that we're seeing in inner-city unemployment, for example, is attributable to immigrants, I think, is a case of scapegoating that I do not believe in." Then, maybe three minutes later: "I also believe we have to give a pathway to citizenship after they have paid a fine and learned English, to those who are already here, because if we don't, they will continue to undermine U.S. wages." Double talk much, Senator?
Obama also favors punishing employers who hire illegal imiigrants, but not because that's against US law or anything, but "we do have to crack down on those employers that are taking advantage of the situation, hiring folks who cannot complain about worker conditions, who aren't getting the minimum wage sometimes, or aren't getting overtime." It's nice to know Obama cares more for the illegal immigrants than those losing jobs because of them.
Senator Clinton, on the other hand, is much more direct about her desire for blanket amnesty: "We will give you a path to legalization if you meet the following condition: pay a fine because you entered illegally, be willing to pay back taxes over time, try to learn English -- and we have to help you do that, because we've cut back on so many of those services." In other words, "We'll give you citizenship, and we'll do everything for you."
During an otherwise dull segment that had nothing to do with issues, Clinton was asks what people would think of another Clinton in the White House, to which she responded with this whopper: "We start from the same place. Nobody has an advantage no matter who you are or where you came from." Sure, Senator. That's why everyone I know is running for President.
On Iraq:
Senator Clinton justifying withdrawing American troop from Iraq: "Yes, we are withdrawing...it's important to send that message to the region, because I think that Iran, Syria, the other countries in the neighborhood, are going to find themselves in a very difficult position as we withdraw. You know, be careful what you wish for.They will be dragged into what is sectarian divisiveness with many different factions among the three main groups." So by running away, we're going to make it the rest of the region's problem? No, Senator. By running away we're going to tell Iran, Syria, and a host of other unsavory characters, "Do with Iraq as you will. It's not our problem anymore."
Senator Clinton also pointed out that she "had to fight to get body armor" for American troops. Maybe she can take that gripe to her buddies like John Kerry, who "voted for the $87 billion (to fund our troops) before voting against it." Even four years later, that still doesn't make any sense whatsoever.
The debate was actually quite civil when the candidates were going after each other. Their major differences came on the minutiae of their policies, which really don;t differ much. One more interesting note: One of the TV sponsors of the debate was an organization that espouses the benefits of using coal, which everyone knows liberals absolutely love.
Thursday, January 31, 2008
Yeah, He Just Needs To Stop Talking
At a campaign stop for his wife, Bill Clinton was quoted as saying "We just have to slow down our economy" to fight global warming. Americans are worried about falling into a recession, and he's saying we need to slow down the economy? Hillary needs to leash him.
Wednesday, January 30, 2008
Outrageously Peeved, Is What I Am
Item One:
Juan McCain won the Florida primary last night. Mitt came in second, followed by a distant Rudy. The reports coming in today are that Rudy will drop out (John Edwards has just done so) and endorse McCain (Edwards did not). Super Tuesday is now less than a week away, and there is an important debate tonight in California. Thankfully, Mitt has vowed to fight on, and I still believe he will be the nominee. McCain is only a Republican, and is he becomes president, we'll have at least four years of legislation like McCain-Feingold ("campaign finance"), McCain-Kennedy (amnesty for illegal immigrants) and McCain-Lieberman (capping greenhouse gas emissions). These are not hallmarks of a conservative.
Item Two:
The economic "stimulus" that has just passed the House of Representatives may have a fatal flaw. According to some analysts, the bill would grant rebates to illegal immigrants who (illegally) paid taxes, even if they have been deported. Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) has vowed to try and "fix" the bill before it passes the Senate and goes to the President's desk.
Juan McCain won the Florida primary last night. Mitt came in second, followed by a distant Rudy. The reports coming in today are that Rudy will drop out (John Edwards has just done so) and endorse McCain (Edwards did not). Super Tuesday is now less than a week away, and there is an important debate tonight in California. Thankfully, Mitt has vowed to fight on, and I still believe he will be the nominee. McCain is only a Republican, and is he becomes president, we'll have at least four years of legislation like McCain-Feingold ("campaign finance"), McCain-Kennedy (amnesty for illegal immigrants) and McCain-Lieberman (capping greenhouse gas emissions). These are not hallmarks of a conservative.
Item Two:
The economic "stimulus" that has just passed the House of Representatives may have a fatal flaw. According to some analysts, the bill would grant rebates to illegal immigrants who (illegally) paid taxes, even if they have been deported. Sen. John Ensign (R-NV) has vowed to try and "fix" the bill before it passes the Senate and goes to the President's desk.
Subscribe to:
Comments (Atom)
